Link to video
Speaking of footnotes, my earlier reference being in reference to the 2nd marriage breaking several extant laws of Parliament and "The Defender of the Faith" being married in a civil ceremony, because that was necessary, Charles, Prince of Wales, now Charles III, himself will be a footnote in history.
He'll be 2 footnotes in history.
His reign will be a footnote in history.
He will be a footnote in Diana's history.
It's a cliche to say that someone will be remembered in 1,000 years.
Oh well.
Diana will be remembered in 1,000 years.
All because of his pathological need to be the center of attention.
He spurned the one person who loved him.
How sad that such behavior is, also, a big standard aspect of human nature.
In the fullness of time, his son and his son's beautiful and devoted wife will ascend.
Maybe then, in spite of the nightmare York family, and the surreal Harry and Meghan drama, there might be a certain sense of closure and of peace.
I wish him no harm, but I won't miss him.