@wtg said:
Anyway, I wonder if people who are immersed in music, have a brain wired for it, and who devote a lot of time and energy to it, see this as the equivalent of cheap wine in the world of piano lessons, and somehow not up to their standards. We need to remember that for some people, cheap wine is totally OK and even enjoyable!
Maybe Payam will get folks into playing, enjoying, and spreading piano music and spreading piano music widely. I think that's a good thing.
I think some (perhaps a lot) of established teachers are up in arms over Payam because it is promoting itself by propagating blatant falsehoods about traditional and other methods. To suddenly appear and tell everyone they've been doing it wrong with nothing more than flimsy marketing isn't going to settle with people who, as you said, have invested themselves heavily (money and time) in the study of music and teaching it.
A good thing because it may get more people interested in piano? There is a limit. They are cheating their teachers by taking 75% of the lesson income. One has to question the quality of the teachers they will obtain.
The way I see Payam right now, it's like those "Learn piano in 2 weeks" frauds that comes along every now and then. But if it works for someone, if only to get them interested, that could be seen as a benefit. And as it was pointed out in the video I posted, Payam's method is not all that dissimilar to a lot of standard methods, despite their claims. But I am worried that they will be taking advantage of ignorance. And it does sound like their main interest is financial, not musical.