@Bernard - I've been catching up a bit, reading other sources including what I think is the NYT article you mentioned. I see that people are talking about studies that seem to demonstrate that low to moderate alcohol consumption may be associated with positive health outcomes in some respects (cardiovascular in particular). In the other camp are the studies that seem to show an association with cancer. And of course the liquor industry is weighing in on everything because of its financial interest.
All of this made me think about the history of smoking and how things rolled out. Two Surgeons General, Leroy Burney in 1957, and Luther Terry in 1964, made headlines with their annoucements about the links between smoking and health.
Some background, if you're so inclined...
https://circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov/2014/01/10/smoking-in-america-50-years-on/
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/surgeon-generals-1964-report-making-smoking-history-201401106970
Getting back to the alcohol debate...
My choice is easy. I'm someone who simply can no longer tolerate alcohol, so I don't consume it anymore because it makes me feel like carp within minutes. But you can bet your bottom dollar that if it didn't have that effect on me, I'd be having an occasional tipple myself.
For the rest of the country, I suspect the debate will go on for decades like smoking did.
Cheers! 🍷