Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. It passed in the Senate

It passed in the Senate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
41 Posts 10 Posters 404 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bernard
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    May it be their undoing.

    The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RontunerR Offline
      RontunerR Offline
      Rontuner
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Signaling we've seen the last election for a while...

      1 Reply Last reply
      • NinaN Offline
        NinaN Offline
        Nina
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Murkowski has no shame.

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • wtgW Offline
          wtgW Offline
          wtg
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said in a post on social media that he will introduce an amendment to the Senate bill that would delete all its text and replace it with the version passed by the House in May.

          One House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Axios there are "well over 20" GOP lawmakers threatening to vote against the bill.

          https://www.axios.com/2025/07/01/mike-johnson-trump-big-beautiful-bill

          When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

          1 Reply Last reply
          • NinaN Nina

            Murkowski has no shame.

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Nina said in It passed in the Senate:

            Murkowski has no shame.

            If not Murkowski, it would be some other Senwte Republican else being the 50th "yea."

            1 Reply Last reply
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel.
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Exactly.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                AndyD
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Could someone briefly list what this will effect please.(obviously your medicare)

                1 Reply Last reply
                • wtgW Offline
                  wtgW Offline
                  wtg
                  wrote on last edited by wtg
                  #9

                  So much packed into this bill. Hard to be brief; it's called the "one big beautiful bill" for a reason.

                  My biggest concern is the price tag. We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

                  https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/senate-gop-tax-bill-would-raise-budget-deficits-4-trillion-over-10-years-crfb

                  And we are leaving a lot of people behind when it comes to medical care. Kaiser has a great summary of changes to a lot of programs.

                  https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

                  CNN hits the highlights of how this will affect various groups:

                  https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/01/politics/congress-senate-bill-tax-spending-trump-gop-explainer

                  When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • wtgW wtg

                    So much packed into this bill. Hard to be brief; it's called the "one big beautiful bill" for a reason.

                    My biggest concern is the price tag. We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

                    https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/senate-gop-tax-bill-would-raise-budget-deficits-4-trillion-over-10-years-crfb

                    And we are leaving a lot of people behind when it comes to medical care. Kaiser has a great summary of changes to a lot of programs.

                    https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

                    CNN hits the highlights of how this will affect various groups:

                    https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/01/politics/congress-senate-bill-tax-spending-trump-gop-explainer

                    AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @wtg said in It passed in the Senate:

                    We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

                    Yeah, I would be quite OK with spending money we don't have on investments, like infrastructure, resource development, education, R&D, etc.

                    Unfortunately it looks like this bill takes on huge deficits to cut taxes for the very rich.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • S Online
                      S Online
                      Steve Miller
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      That’s the whole purpose. Always was.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        A new absurdity in the bill:

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/02/upshot/republicans-food-aid-alaska.html

                        It goes like this:

                        • the intent was originally was to make the states that have higher error rates when it comes to administering the food stamp programs pay more -- supposedly this is to encourage states to "have skin in the game" to lower error rates when administering the food stamp programs.
                        • But to get Murkowski's vote, with Murkowski representing the state with the highest food stamp administration error rate, the Senate bill ended up adding a provision that exempts states whose food stamp error rates exceeding certain threshold from having to pay anything at all (at least for a while).
                        • so if the Senate bill ended comes to pass, the states with high error rates will be exempt from paying for the food stamps (at least for a while), while states with low-enough food error rates will have to pay something.
                        • in effect, this may end up incentivizing states to jack up their food stamp administration error rates (at least for a while) to avoid having to pay anything towards the their food stamp programs.

                        The modern GOP really sucks at governing.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        • D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Daniel.
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Copayments for Medicaid recipients.

                          How absurd.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Axtremus

                            A new absurdity in the bill:

                            https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/02/upshot/republicans-food-aid-alaska.html

                            It goes like this:

                            • the intent was originally was to make the states that have higher error rates when it comes to administering the food stamp programs pay more -- supposedly this is to encourage states to "have skin in the game" to lower error rates when administering the food stamp programs.
                            • But to get Murkowski's vote, with Murkowski representing the state with the highest food stamp administration error rate, the Senate bill ended up adding a provision that exempts states whose food stamp error rates exceeding certain threshold from having to pay anything at all (at least for a while).
                            • so if the Senate bill ended comes to pass, the states with high error rates will be exempt from paying for the food stamps (at least for a while), while states with low-enough food error rates will have to pay something.
                            • in effect, this may end up incentivizing states to jack up their food stamp administration error rates (at least for a while) to avoid having to pay anything towards the their food stamp programs.

                            The modern GOP really sucks at governing.

                            S Online
                            S Online
                            Steve Miller
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @Axtremus

                            Random Internet sites inform me that the Murkowski provision was eliminated from the bill right after Murkowski voted. Not sure if if that’s possible.

                            Have not been able to verify.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • wtgW Offline
                              wtgW Offline
                              wtg
                              wrote on last edited by wtg
                              #15

                              Inside Hakeem Jeffries' decision to filibuster Trump's big bill

                              The overwhelming consensus on Capitol Hill was that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) would only delay President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" by about an hour. As noon approached on Thursday, that expectation was shattered.

                              Why it matters: For months, the Democratic base has been demanding their party's leaders "fight harder" and use every tool at their disposal to stymie the GOP agenda. In the eyes of many lawmakers, this is Jeffries delivering.

                              Jeffries blasted the GOP's marquee tax and spending bill as an "immoral document," vowing to "stand up and push back against it with everything we have on behalf of the American people."

                              As of late Thursday morning, Jeffries was on track to surpass then-Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) record-breaking, 8-and-a-half hour speech to delay the Build Back Better vote in 2021.

                              If Jeffries keeps speaking until 1:23pm ET, he will have set a new record.

                              https://www.axios.com/2025/07/03/hakeem-jeffries-speech-big-beautiful-bill-trump

                              When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • wtgW Offline
                                wtgW Offline
                                wtg
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                The dueling House and Senate bills differ on details but agreed on a key point: Both would massively expand federal spending on immigration enforcement.

                                Overall, the Senate version will dedicate $175 billion to an immigration crackdown, including an extra $30 billion for ICE, which can be spent over four years. To put that in perspective, ICE’s current budget is about $8 billion per year.

                                The bill also designates $45 billion for detention facilities, which can also be spent at any time over the next four years. By comparison, the U.S. spends about $8 billion a year on the Bureau of Prisons.

                                From The Intercept:

                                https://archive.is/GQ2Hi

                                When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • wtgW Offline
                                  wtgW Offline
                                  wtg
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Who are the winners, and who are the losers. Bloomberg reporting.

                                  https://archive.is/6l7dB

                                  When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    Bernard
                                    wrote on last edited by Bernard
                                    #18

                                    Murkowski doesn't give a *^&) about people in states other than her own. She admits the bill is bad but votes for it anyway in hopes that useless Mike will cover her (&&. Makes me want to barf. My opinion of her actions really isn't fit for printing.

                                    The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • AxtremusA Offline
                                      AxtremusA Offline
                                      Axtremus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Is Murkowski worse than the other 49 GOP Senators who voted for the bill? Presumably these 49 GOP voted more enthusiastically for the bill compared to Murkowski.

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                        Is Murkowski worse than the other 49 GOP Senators who voted for the bill? Presumably these 49 GOP voted more enthusiastically for the bill compared to Murkowski.

                                        B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        Bernard
                                        wrote on last edited by Bernard
                                        #20

                                        @Axtremus

                                        Presumably these 49 GOP voted more enthusiastically for the bill compared to Murkowski.

                                        Well, that's what makes Collins and Murkowski so bad. They betray themselves. Collins, over and over again, makes sure we know how concerned she is, yet almost always fails to reach the conclusion that her logic should dictate. (She held her ground on this vote, good for her.) Murkowski flat out stated how bad the bill was and that she hoped shallow Mike would change it in the House. How f'n clueless can you be? These two excel at abdicating responsibility--responsibility that they spend a lot of time trying to convince us they have a handle on, when in fact it boils down to little more than a show because more often than not they don't have the spine to do the right thing. But we know they're concerned and they've thought about saving the day, but in the end, they cave.

                                        The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

                                        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • B Bernard

                                          @Axtremus

                                          Presumably these 49 GOP voted more enthusiastically for the bill compared to Murkowski.

                                          Well, that's what makes Collins and Murkowski so bad. They betray themselves. Collins, over and over again, makes sure we know how concerned she is, yet almost always fails to reach the conclusion that her logic should dictate. (She held her ground on this vote, good for her.) Murkowski flat out stated how bad the bill was and that she hoped shallow Mike would change it in the House. How f'n clueless can you be? These two excel at abdicating responsibility--responsibility that they spend a lot of time trying to convince us they have a handle on, when in fact it boils down to little more than a show because more often than not they don't have the spine to do the right thing. But we know they're concerned and they've thought about saving the day, but in the end, they cave.

                                          AxtremusA Offline
                                          AxtremusA Offline
                                          Axtremus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @Bernard said in It passed in the Senate:

                                          They betray themselves.

                                          On that note:

                                          https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/03/us/politics/republican-criticism-trump-policy-bill.html?unlocked_article_code=1.T08.PEVI.ql80hNTGogFG

                                          The article rounds up the GOP legislators who publicly savaged the bill then voted for it anyway.

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups