Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. It passed in the Senate

It passed in the Senate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
14 Posts 8 Posters 94 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NinaN Offline
    NinaN Offline
    Nina
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    Murkowski has no shame.

    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • wtgW Offline
      wtgW Offline
      wtg
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said in a post on social media that he will introduce an amendment to the Senate bill that would delete all its text and replace it with the version passed by the House in May.

      One House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Axios there are "well over 20" GOP lawmakers threatening to vote against the bill.

      https://www.axios.com/2025/07/01/mike-johnson-trump-big-beautiful-bill

      When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

      1 Reply Last reply
      • NinaN Nina

        Murkowski has no shame.

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @Nina said in It passed in the Senate:

        Murkowski has no shame.

        If not Murkowski, it would be some other Senwte Republican else being the 50th "yea."

        1 Reply Last reply
        • D Online
          D Online
          Daniel.
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          Exactly.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            AndyD
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            Could someone briefly list what this will effect please.(obviously your medicare)

            1 Reply Last reply
            • wtgW Offline
              wtgW Offline
              wtg
              wrote last edited by wtg
              #9

              So much packed into this bill. Hard to be brief; it's called the "one big beautiful bill" for a reason.

              My biggest concern is the price tag. We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

              https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/senate-gop-tax-bill-would-raise-budget-deficits-4-trillion-over-10-years-crfb

              And we are leaving a lot of people behind when it comes to medical care. Kaiser has a great summary of changes to a lot of programs.

              https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

              CNN hits the highlights of how this will affect various groups:

              https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/01/politics/congress-senate-bill-tax-spending-trump-gop-explainer

              When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
              • wtgW wtg

                So much packed into this bill. Hard to be brief; it's called the "one big beautiful bill" for a reason.

                My biggest concern is the price tag. We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

                https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/senate-gop-tax-bill-would-raise-budget-deficits-4-trillion-over-10-years-crfb

                And we are leaving a lot of people behind when it comes to medical care. Kaiser has a great summary of changes to a lot of programs.

                https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

                CNN hits the highlights of how this will affect various groups:

                https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/01/politics/congress-senate-bill-tax-spending-trump-gop-explainer

                AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @wtg said in It passed in the Senate:

                We keep spending way more money than we have. And this bill takes money from people who don't have much and gives it to people who do.

                Yeah, I would be quite OK with spending money we don't have on investments, like infrastructure, resource development, education, R&D, etc.

                Unfortunately it looks like this bill takes on huge deficits to cut taxes for the very rich.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Steve Miller
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  That’s the whole purpose. Always was.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    A new absurdity in the bill:

                    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/02/upshot/republicans-food-aid-alaska.html

                    It goes like this:

                    • the intent was originally was to make the states that have higher error rates when it comes to administering the food stamp programs pay more -- supposedly this is to encourage states to "have skin in the game" to lower error rates when administering the food stamp programs.
                    • But to get Murkowski's vote, with Murkowski representing the state with the highest food stamp administration error rate, the Senate bill ended up adding a provision that exempts states whose food stamp error rates exceeding certain threshold from having to pay anything at all (at least for a while).
                    • so if the Senate bill ended comes to pass, the states with high error rates will be exempt from paying for the food stamps (at least for a while), while states with low-enough food error rates will have to pay something.
                    • in effect, this may end up incentivizing states to jack up their food stamp administration error rates (at least for a while) to avoid having to pay anything towards the their food stamp programs.

                    The modern GOP really sucks at governing.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    • D Online
                      D Online
                      Daniel.
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      Copayments for Medicaid recipients.

                      How absurd.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Axtremus

                        A new absurdity in the bill:

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/02/upshot/republicans-food-aid-alaska.html

                        It goes like this:

                        • the intent was originally was to make the states that have higher error rates when it comes to administering the food stamp programs pay more -- supposedly this is to encourage states to "have skin in the game" to lower error rates when administering the food stamp programs.
                        • But to get Murkowski's vote, with Murkowski representing the state with the highest food stamp administration error rate, the Senate bill ended up adding a provision that exempts states whose food stamp error rates exceeding certain threshold from having to pay anything at all (at least for a while).
                        • so if the Senate bill ended comes to pass, the states with high error rates will be exempt from paying for the food stamps (at least for a while), while states with low-enough food error rates will have to pay something.
                        • in effect, this may end up incentivizing states to jack up their food stamp administration error rates (at least for a while) to avoid having to pay anything towards the their food stamp programs.

                        The modern GOP really sucks at governing.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Steve Miller
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @Axtremus

                        Random Internet sites inform me that the Murkowski provision was eliminated from the bill right after Murkowski voted. Not sure if if that’s possible.

                        Have not been able to verify.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups