Interesting! And given the damage that auto-immune diseases cause in other parts of the body, the argument has some intuitive appeal.

I don't know why he and his fans might have expected him to win the prize now. The stipulations for qualifying say quite clearly, it's for the person who've done the most to help the world IN THE PRECEDING YEAR! I see this meaning, though, originally accurate (see below) is no longer applied so strictly. *"That interpretation is incorrect in practice, though it is based on a specific, and now more loosely interpreted, phrase from Alfred Nobel's will. While the award is meant to recognize work that "shall have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind," the Nobel Committee does not strictly limit its consideration to only the preceding year. Here is a breakdown of how this misconception arose and how the selection process actually works: Alfred Nobel's original wording: In his 1895 will, Alfred Nobel stated the prizes should go to those who "during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit to mankind". A flexible interpretation: The Norwegian Nobel Committee has not interpreted "the preceding year" literally since the first awards in 1901. This is because the kind of work that promotes peace is often a long-term endeavor that may not show its full impact within a single calendar year. Looking at a nominee's full body of work: Instead, the committee considers a candidate's overall body of work and long-term contribution to peace, even if the award is prompted by recent developments. Example: Martin Luther King Jr.: When Martin Luther King Jr. won the prize in 1964, the committee recognized his years of sustained work and leadership in the Civil Rights Movement, not just his actions in 1963. Example: Narges Mohammadi: More recently, Narges Mohammadi won the 2023 prize "for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran," a cause she has championed for decades. The committee's deliberations are private and held under a 50-year confidentiality rule, giving them the freedom to look back over an individual or organization's career to find the most deserving recipient. " In any case , you-know-who most certainly does NOT qualify for the prize for countless reasons, not the least of which is the time frame.

RIP indeed. She always had such a good hat game! I remember this one from the Godfather!! [image: diane-keaton-the-godfather-030124-1-1fe70c83035c43628c8774e460f13a2d.jpg]

I was just thinking about them the other day. That’s was so awful,

[image: 1760189636152-page1_1.jpg] [image: 1760189639869-page2_1.jpg]

@kluurs [image: 1760151770553-27e47c87-8ec0-418f-91ea-625162acdd97-image-resized.jpeg] https://www.shoplavana.com/cdn/shop/files/IMG-7810_1024x1024@2x.jpg?v=1719435901 I don’t know what I would do if I met a woman wearing this..

Link to video Words fail.

@ShiroKuro Yes, goldens are among the sweetest dogs!

@Steve-Miller Thanks!

I can’t believe she keeps a straight face when she lies like that. Shameful.

That’s so fun!

Beautiful!

Just a note, my experience with Tik Tok isn't much different than SK's. I've never used it. I have been to its home page, and my first thought was that the interface looked complicated and stupid, and I hit the back button.

Weak, yes. But, also, Clinton stabbed the working class in the back, and Democrats, at this late date, suck at representing the poor, the working class, and the middle class (on economic and labor issues if I'm not being clear). They are good at bending the knee to almost everyone else.

That was a remarkable story and one I had not heard before. I have read about how even civilians - men, women, along with their children - were convinced to opt for suicide rather than surrender. I'm astounded how the Marine was able to argue so persuasively against that indoctrination. Big Al