Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. COVID revisited

COVID revisited

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
18 Posts 7 Posters 143 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RontunerR Offline
    RontunerR Offline
    Rontuner
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    My son and now daughter in law were the sickest they've ever been around Xmas 2019. She was working front desk at a downtown Chicago hotel and I'd bet there were cases going around here long before that first documented case.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • AndyDA Offline
      AndyDA Offline
      AndyD
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      We just rolled out eyes at the non-takers and no-maskers, for whatever reason they gave, and muttered quietly "Darwinism in action".
      Guess that we are far more trusting of our NHS.

      Little doubt that it came from a Wuhan laboratory is there?
      Our first known case in November 2019:

      7566.jpg

      Ventosa viri restabit

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #11

        My understanding is the technical virological evidence on either explanation is circumstantial.

        The human evidence is more damning though and points to a lab leak. Like when the lab permanently took their virus database offline in the fall of 2019.

        As one wag put it, "Why would bat-virus scientists working at a bat-virus lab hide bat-virus data during a local bat-virus outbreak?"

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AndyDA Offline
          AndyDA Offline
          AndyD
          wrote last edited by AndyD
          #12

          No cross over animal from bat to human has been found.
          Is it just a massive coincidence the market at the hub of the pandemic is so close to the Wuhan Institue of Virolgy?

          CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.
          Yet:
          https://theconversation.com/the-covid-lab-leak-theory-is-dead-heres-how-we-know-the-virus-came-from-a-wuhan-market-188163

          Ventosa viri restabit

          wtgW 1 Reply Last reply
          • AndyDA AndyD

            No cross over animal from bat to human has been found.
            Is it just a massive coincidence the market at the hub of the pandemic is so close to the Wuhan Institue of Virolgy?

            CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.
            Yet:
            https://theconversation.com/the-covid-lab-leak-theory-is-dead-heres-how-we-know-the-virus-came-from-a-wuhan-market-188163

            wtgW Offline
            wtgW Offline
            wtg
            wrote last edited by wtg
            #13

            @AndyD said:

            CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.

            Not arguing that it didn't come from the lab, but when did the CIA and FBI determine that? The Conversation article you linked is from 2022. Just wondering if it's an apples to apples comparison....

            AndyDA 1 Reply Last reply
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @andyd

              I agree with you that it’s the most likely scenario. I’m just saying there is still no proof either way. At least until the CCP makes it available.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RontunerR Offline
                RontunerR Offline
                Rontuner
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                Neither CIA or FBI could be politically motivated, right???

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                • RontunerR Rontuner

                  Neither CIA or FBI could be politically motivated, right???

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @Rontuner said:

                  Neither CIA or FBI could be politically motivated, right???

                  Certainly less so than the NIH.

                  FWIW, it was Biden's FBI and CIA.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AndyDA Offline
                    AndyDA Offline
                    AndyD
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    I reckon we'll never see conclusive evidence. It'll remain a conveniently ambiguous historical mystery.

                    I'll try to find the newspaper article that persuaded me it was a laboratory leak.

                    Ventosa viri restabit

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • wtgW wtg

                      @AndyD said:

                      CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.

                      Not arguing that it didn't come from the lab, but when did the CIA and FBI determine that? The Conversation article you linked is from 2022. Just wondering if it's an apples to apples comparison....

                      AndyDA Offline
                      AndyDA Offline
                      AndyD
                      wrote last edited by AndyD
                      #18

                      @wtg said:

                      CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.

                      Not arguing that it didn't come from the lab, but when did the CIA and FBI determine that?
                      ....

                      CIA Jan 2025, FBI Feb 2023

                      I can't find the newspaper article with everyhing on a timeline, but the following is my quick review on the Wuhan biological warfare research institue, the criminally negligent accidental escape of the covid virus, and the start of the CCP cover up and obfuscation:

                      ...there was no cellphone activity in a high-security portion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology from Oct. 7 through Oct. 24, 2019, and that there may have been a "hazardous event" sometime between Oct. 6 and Oct. 11.

                      ... three researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had fallen ill with Covid-19 in November 2019 and were admitted to hospital...

                      This predates the 7 market sourced cases reported by Dr. Li, the Chinese opthalmologist on 30th December 2019. He was silenced by Chinese authorities, caught covid in January and unfortunarely died.

                      A Jan. 24 study published in the medical journal The Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — didn't provide a documented link to the Wuhan wet market.

                      The bats that carry the family of coronaviruses linked to the new strain aren't found within 100 miles of Wuhan — but they were studied in both labs.

                      Photos and videos have emerged of researchers at both labs collecting samples from bats without wearing protective gear, which experts say poses a risk of human infection.

                      A U.S. State Department expert who visited the WIV in 2018 wrote in a cable reported by The Washington Post: "During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, [U.S. diplomats] noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory."

                      And the cover up...
                      According to Senate Intelligence Committee member Tom Cotton, R-Ark., the Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the WIV in January.
                      The Shanghai laboratory where researchers published the world's first genome sequence of the coronavirus was shut down Jan. 12, according to The South China Morning Post.
                      According to U.S. intelligence assessments, including one published by the Department of Homeland Security and reviewed by NBC News, the Chinese government initially covered up the severity of the outbreak. Government officials threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus, weren't candid about human-to-human transmission...

                      So, 1 million US deaths later, and up to 40 million worldwide, the CCP continues to try to save face.

                      Ventosa viri restabit

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups