COVID revisited
-
We just rolled out eyes at the non-takers and no-maskers, for whatever reason they gave, and muttered quietly "Darwinism in action".
Guess that we are far more trusting of our NHS.Little doubt that it came from a Wuhan laboratory is there?
Our first known case in November 2019:
-
My understanding is the technical virological evidence on either explanation is circumstantial.
The human evidence is more damning though and points to a lab leak. Like when the lab permanently took their virus database offline in the fall of 2019.
As one wag put it, "Why would bat-virus scientists working at a bat-virus lab hide bat-virus data during a local bat-virus outbreak?"
-
No cross over animal from bat to human has been found.
Is it just a massive coincidence the market at the hub of the pandemic is so close to the Wuhan Institue of Virolgy?CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.
Yet:
https://theconversation.com/the-covid-lab-leak-theory-is-dead-heres-how-we-know-the-virus-came-from-a-wuhan-market-188163 -
No cross over animal from bat to human has been found.
Is it just a massive coincidence the market at the hub of the pandemic is so close to the Wuhan Institue of Virolgy?CIA and FBI both say it was laboratory sourced.
Yet:
https://theconversation.com/the-covid-lab-leak-theory-is-dead-heres-how-we-know-the-virus-came-from-a-wuhan-market-188163
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login