Bueller? Bueller?

[wtg]

Ferris Bueller’s Day Off Is 40—Here’s the Story Behind the Real-Life Ferrari House

On the anniversary of the film, AD goes behind the movie magic that allowed a sports car to burst through the glass at an architecturally significant property

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/ferris-buellers-day-off-is-40-heres-the-story-behind-the-real-life-ferrari-house

[Mik]

I have never watched the whole movie.

[jon-nyc]

I saw it in the theater. That was the month I graduated.

I watched it again when I moved to Chicago.

[dolmansaxlil]

I have seen it countless times. I am turning 50 (tomorrow!) so it started playing on tv when I was the absolute perfect age. It’s aged (relatively) well compared to others from the same time.

[Jodi]

I feel like I’m the only person on the planet that found that movie incredibly irritating.

[Axtremus]

I don't find the movie irritating, but I find the protagonist titular character rather fake.

[Piano*Dad]

I think you focussed on the wrong "protagonist."

This is the main character ...

https://people.com/thmb/F6H7kEQqyBz3oAEfHcl4uRWhMmk=/750x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2):format(webp)/alan-ruck-ec7ec079f16b4665819b695a35da7fae.jpg

[ShiroKuro]

I have never seen the movie or even snippets of it. Perhaps I'll try to watch it some day.

[Axtremus]

@Piano-Dad said:

I think you focussed on the wrong "protagonist."

This is the main character ...

In that case, I will happily revise my statements to refer to "the titular character."

[Mik]

Heh heh. You said 'titular'.