Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. The Debate

The Debate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
12 Posts 8 Posters 226 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Online
    S Online
    Steve Miller
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I watched the whole thing so you don’t have to.

    Pretty much a wash, IMHO. Vance behaved himself. Walz did fine. But the most interesting thing I saw was when Walz became Walz. On the abortion thing.

    Walz slowed down. He owned the space. He’s comfortable here and he showed it. He’s the Dad you had before Fox stole him away. Very, very effective because it reads as real.

    He should do more of that.

    ShiroKuroS 1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      My take was I’d vote for either one over their running mates.

      “I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
      ― Douglas Adams

      1 Reply Last reply
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        Daniel
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        His football coach persona seems alien and phantasmagoric to me but that's just me.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • S Steve Miller

          I watched the whole thing so you don’t have to.

          Pretty much a wash, IMHO. Vance behaved himself. Walz did fine. But the most interesting thing I saw was when Walz became Walz. On the abortion thing.

          Walz slowed down. He owned the space. He’s comfortable here and he showed it. He’s the Dad you had before Fox stole him away. Very, very effective because it reads as real.

          He should do more of that.

          ShiroKuroS Offline
          ShiroKuroS Offline
          ShiroKuro
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @Steve-Miller said in The Debate:

          I watched the whole thing so you don’t have to.

          Thank you! 😉

          Walz slowed down. He owned the space. He’s comfortable here and he showed it. He’s the Dad you had before Fox stole him away. Very, very effective because it reads as real.

          He should do more of that.

          I’ll have to see if I can find a clip of that part.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            CHAS
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Steve, Thank you for watching that for me. I "left the building".

            Mik, I thought I might prefer Walz to Harris, but I think Vance would be not better than Trump, probably worse, because he would shift with the tides and not in a good way.

            “I’m at an age when remembering something right away is as good as an orgasm.”—Gloria Steinem to Julia Louis-Dreyfus on Wiser Than Me

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Q Offline
              Q Offline
              Quirt Evans
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Vance is coherent and intelligent, which Trump is not. He's also verbally skilled and quick on his feet.

              I know this is a partisan take, but it's a question of whether you prefer evil and smart to an evil, stupid, possibly suffering from early stages dementia, narcissistic bully.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                The encouraging thing that came out last night was how much common ground was identified. Again, I'd take either of them over the tops of the tickets.

                On a lighter note, I'd love to play poker with Walz and am sure I would clean him out. His face gives away too much. I imagine he could muster a poker face if the stakes were high enough, but I didn't see it last night.

                “I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
                ― Douglas Adams

                ShiroKuroS 1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Mik

                  The encouraging thing that came out last night was how much common ground was identified. Again, I'd take either of them over the tops of the tickets.

                  On a lighter note, I'd love to play poker with Walz and am sure I would clean him out. His face gives away too much. I imagine he could muster a poker face if the stakes were high enough, but I didn't see it last night.

                  ShiroKuroS Offline
                  ShiroKuroS Offline
                  ShiroKuro
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Mik said in The Debate:

                  His face gives away too much. I imagine he could muster a poker face if the stakes were high enough, but I didn't see it last night.

                  Could that have been intentional? I didn't watch, so you may be referring to something else, but there's something to be said for letting people know what you're thinking without saying so verbally.

                  As to Vance, absolutely not. There's no way I'd prefer him over Harris or Walz, for starters. And I suspect he's smarter than Trump, but just as evil and just as much of a narcissistic opportunist. So not a good combination.

                  Also, you know, there are all his policy stances, which I find abhorrent.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  • ShiroKuroS ShiroKuro

                    @Mik said in The Debate:

                    His face gives away too much. I imagine he could muster a poker face if the stakes were high enough, but I didn't see it last night.

                    Could that have been intentional? I didn't watch, so you may be referring to something else, but there's something to be said for letting people know what you're thinking without saying so verbally.

                    As to Vance, absolutely not. There's no way I'd prefer him over Harris or Walz, for starters. And I suspect he's smarter than Trump, but just as evil and just as much of a narcissistic opportunist. So not a good combination.

                    Also, you know, there are all his policy stances, which I find abhorrent.

                    S Online
                    S Online
                    Steve Miller
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    And Vance lied like 40 times.

                    I have a problem with that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      pique
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The civility was refreshing and unexpected. Walz let Vance get away with too much, and he seemed incoherent at times. Vance scared me because he's polished, poised, a good debater, and comes off as credible, even though he lies like a rug. Walz was a lot more likeable, but I found myself wishing Harris had chosen Buttigieg instead. He would have mopped the floor with Vance.

                      fear is the thief of dreams

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Daniel
                        wrote on last edited by Daniel
                        #11

                        I thought Vance won. Waltz looked like a deer in the headlights. It's a very difficult argument to make that a page needs to be turned and you're the one who can turn it when you're representing a ticket with a lead who has been incumbent for the last three and a half years.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • wtgW Offline
                          wtgW Offline
                          wtg
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Tangle's take.

                          https://www.readtangle.com/special-edition-the-vice-presidential-debate/?ref=tangle-newsletter

                          When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups