Mid-2026 AI Usage Check
-
I thought it would be interesting to do periodic surveys of how (or if) we are using AI.
What model or models do you use? If more than one, is there rhyme or reason as to when you choose one over another? Are you paying for any?
Has your use moved beyond the google on steroids? IOW, are you just asking it questions or are you doing more advanced stuff like vibe coding, running multiple agents, etc?
Feel free to add a relevant question I missed.
I'll start:
I have CHatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini apps installed on my phone, all in a neat row on the bottom of my front page. I pay for ChatGPT monthly, I'm finishing up a year's subscription to Grok which I won't renew. I was about to start paying for Claude to get Fable 5 but it was swiped by USG before I could. I imagine I'll be paying for Claude and ChatGPT moving forward.
ChatGPT and Claude get most of my attention (makes sense, they are the two frontier models). Grok I mostly use for the 'explain this tweet' feature. Gemini I use only very occasionally. Very occasionally I'll ask the same question to the four models to see if the answers align (cutting and pasting is trivial, so why not).
I find that once a model gets a lot of history and context with you the switching costs are very real, if not dollar denominated. That keeps me on CHatGPT for a few topics - my work and my health issues - even while I've moved to Claude for much else.
Not done any coding with them yet. I may try to play around with them to either replace or increase the efficiency of some of the bespoke spreadsheets I've been using for many years.
Haven't got any agents working. In that sense I'm still a basic if frequent user.
How about you?
-
I've used the free version of Claude for reducing imaging reports (MRIs and CT scans) to understandable summaries. Also for interpreting progress reports from physical, occupational, and speech therapists. For both the imaging and the therapy reports I fed in the reports over time and Claude did a good job helping me understand what progress/lack thereof that Mr wtg's therapists are seeing. Saved me a ton of time figuring out all the terminology.
I also used it to help figure out how to use ramps to facilitate wheelchair access to our house. It was lousy at that until I redirected it. And then it was still not very good. It did tell me which manufacturers have the highest quality products. It was probably a toss up whether it actually saved me time or not.
It gave a couple of off-the-wall interpretations about things that happened in therapy. It is much more "emotional" than I expected. I thought it would be more logical and detached.
It did a pretty good job comparing two OTC e-stim devices we were considering for home use to help try to wake up Mr wtg's arm.
I have found its fawning to be annoying. "You're so smart to have figured this out." "Mr wtg is so lucky to have you as an advocate in his corner." I haven't asked it to stop doing this yet, but I'm pretty close.
The mini-AIs that are in Amazon that answer questions about various products are basically useless at this point. And duck.ai (pops up in DuckDuckGo searches) and Leo (part of Brave) also have pretty limited use.
Haven't done anything beyond that.
I feel like I did when I first started using Netscape and AltaVista to access the info on the internet. The information and analysis that are available is amazing. But I'm also a bit troubled by the quality of the results. I still feel like I have to double check a lot of things because it can miss information and its analysis can be flawed. That becomes apparent if you have any background in the topic at hand. The quality of the prompts is definitely a factor; you kind of have to figure out how to use it. If you don't and take it at face value I could see running into problems.
-
Ha. I just used it to give me the skinny on carpeting. We will be replace our aged plush with something more wheelchair friendly. Claude did a great job.
And I also asked about how to set up and use the NMES gizmo that we bought for e-stim to see if we can wake up the arm. It was very comprehensive.
-
I've used the free version of Claude for reducing imaging reports (MRIs and CT scans) to understandable summaries. Also for interpreting progress reports from physical, occupational, and speech therapists. For both the imaging and the therapy reports I fed in the reports over time and Claude did a good job helping me understand what progress/lack thereof that Mr wtg's therapists are seeing. Saved me a ton of time figuring out all the terminology.
I also used it to help figure out how to use ramps to facilitate wheelchair access to our house. It was lousy at that until I redirected it. And then it was still not very good. It did tell me which manufacturers have the highest quality products. It was probably a toss up whether it actually saved me time or not.
It gave a couple of off-the-wall interpretations about things that happened in therapy. It is much more "emotional" than I expected. I thought it would be more logical and detached.
It did a pretty good job comparing two OTC e-stim devices we were considering for home use to help try to wake up Mr wtg's arm.
I have found its fawning to be annoying. "You're so smart to have figured this out." "Mr wtg is so lucky to have you as an advocate in his corner." I haven't asked it to stop doing this yet, but I'm pretty close.
The mini-AIs that are in Amazon that answer questions about various products are basically useless at this point. And duck.ai (pops up in DuckDuckGo searches) and Leo (part of Brave) also have pretty limited use.
Haven't done anything beyond that.
I feel like I did when I first started using Netscape and AltaVista to access the info on the internet. The information and analysis that are available is amazing. But I'm also a bit troubled by the quality of the results. I still feel like I have to double check a lot of things because it can miss information and its analysis can be flawed. That becomes apparent if you have any background in the topic at hand. The quality of the prompts is definitely a factor; you kind of have to figure out how to use it. If you don't and take it at face value I could see running into problems.
For work, I use ChatGPT not to help me, but because I'm studying its output patterns for a research project. I don't use AI in my own writing, or for most teaching things (like grading, no AI for grading).
I might start using Notebook LM a bit more in an upcoming project, I haven't decided yet... and in the fall, I might start using AI (maybe ChatGPT? I want to make some GPTs) for some analysis tasks. Also not decided about that yet. I have a love-hate relationship with AI (like a lot of people...) Also, from all that I done with it, I recognize that it is both incredibly powerful and sometimes so bad that it's laughable. And if you're not already an expert, you are most likely going to miss the big errors and hallucinations.
For personal stuff, I mainly use ChatGPT for health-related stuff, and like @wtg I worry about the accuracy/reliability of the output, so for anything important, I tend to use the AI output as a jumping off point, follow the links provided, and then look for reliable sources once I have a better idea of what to look for. So I feel like that's pretty helpful but I can also imagine how you could get sort of lulled into not paying attention or looking at things with a critical eye, and then internalize something that's actually not correct and potentially harmful, esp. with health stuff.
I have found its fawning to be annoying. "You're so smart to have figured this out." "Mr wtg is so lucky to have you as an advocate in his corner." I haven't asked it to stop doing this yet, but I'm pretty close.
I agree, that gets annoying very fast. Even just starting with "that's a great question" is tiresome.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login