Payam Method for piano lessons
-
Here come the rebuttals!!
This video is long (over 40 minutes) but I watched/listened to it while doing chores and it was quite interesting!
The TL;DR version: 60 Minutes failed at investigative journalism on this one, it was one big infomercial. The Payam Method is not just the Code.com guy backing it but also Mark Cuban, and the day after the segment aired, they announced their big product launch.
Gross.
Oh and that doesn’t even include all the piano-specific details that the video refutes. Nice!
-
-
Gross.
Why do you think it is gross?
Because it sounds like 60 Minutes and the Payam backers made a coordinated effort to do this big marketing push, the segment is disguised to look like one of their regular segments (which should be based on investigative journalism) but is actually just a big fat infomercial, all the while dissing the piano teaching profession in unfair ways and further contributing to the current view of learning and teaching as transactional, commercial endeavors.
I think that’s all pretty gross.
-
disclaimer: I have no allegiance to the Payam Method; I just posted the 60 Minutes piece because it was about pianos!
It seems that we're morphing into fact checking...
I started to fact check Meghan's debunking about there being no real statistics about how many people quit after a year of starting lessons; she was questioning the 80 percent figure quoted by Payam. Apparently that's one of those statistics that is often repeated, but may not be really accurate. Such as the notion about having to drink 8 glasses of water a day.
Anyway, here is some info for anyone who is interested.
Another piano lesson site and their claim:
Why Kids Quit Piano Lessons: What Research Shows
Research from the University of Ottawa’s Piano Pedagogy Department revealed something surprising: nearly 80% of piano students quit within the first three years of lessons.They don't cite their source specifically, but I found this thesis from someone at the University of Ottawa that seems like it might be where they got their info:
Sometimes you have to fact check the fact checkers....
-
Because it sounds like 60 Minutes and the Payam backers made a coordinated effort to do this big marketing push, the segment is disguised to look like one of their regular segments (which should be based on investigative journalism) but is actually just a big fat infomercial, all the while dissing the piano teaching profession in unfair ways and further contributing to the current view of learning and teaching as transactional, commercial endeavors.
I think that’s all pretty gross.
-
I just registered for a 'fee' online lesson. Turns out there's a $75 deposit. If you continue the deposit is applied to your lessons. So what if I don't continue?
Sounds scammy.
“I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
― Douglas Adams -
disclaimer: I have no allegiance to the Payam Method; I just posted the 60 Minutes piece because it was about pianos!
It seems that we're morphing into fact checking...
I started to fact check Meghan's debunking about there being no real statistics about how many people quit after a year of starting lessons; she was questioning the 80 percent figure quoted by Payam. Apparently that's one of those statistics that is often repeated, but may not be really accurate. Such as the notion about having to drink 8 glasses of water a day.
Anyway, here is some info for anyone who is interested.
Another piano lesson site and their claim:
Why Kids Quit Piano Lessons: What Research Shows
Research from the University of Ottawa’s Piano Pedagogy Department revealed something surprising: nearly 80% of piano students quit within the first three years of lessons.They don't cite their source specifically, but I found this thesis from someone at the University of Ottawa that seems like it might be where they got their info:
Sometimes you have to fact check the fact checkers....
@wtg Although I suspect the drop out rate is high, the study you linked states,
While these fabled statistics appear frequently in informal pedagogical
discussions, there is very little data to support these opinions. Even among researchers, statistics regarding dropouts are often simply based on impressions ... [pages 3-4]Reading further on page 4, it's not surprising that a lot of dropping out occurs just before, or early into puberty.
-
I just registered for a 'fee' online lesson. Turns out there's a $75 deposit. If you continue the deposit is applied to your lessons. So what if I don't continue?
Sounds scammy.
Sounds scammy.
It's the brave new world.
I ran into the same kind of thing with a couple of products, where even after an initial purchase there's the requirement to buy something else. It's the whole subscription model thing, with appropriate social media hype, and an endless series of emails (or texts) asking you how much you love product X and please share your experiences on their Facebook/X/etc page.
It's exhausting. Who has time to talk about their tooth brush on a regular basis?
-
In a way, it's a little peculiar that we focus so much on the drop out rate. We don't do that with the visual arts. It doesn't seem like we hear about concerns about the number of young people who stop making art. (Maybe it's just me.) Or sports. Or any other endeavor that requires strong effort.
-
In a way, it's a little peculiar that we focus so much on the drop out rate. We don't do that with the visual arts. It doesn't seem like we hear about concerns about the number of young people who stop making art. (Maybe it's just me.) Or sports. Or any other endeavor that requires strong effort.
In a way, it's a little peculiar that we focus so much on the drop out rate.
This is Payam's "hook". Find a "problem" and claim to solve it.
Problem: People drop lessons
Payam's solution: We make it fun so they don't drop out!One thing I will say is that I think there's a whole bunch of us who are part of the great unwashed masses who don't necessarily have the time, skills, or inclination to devote to the fine points of learning to play piano.
Using myself as an example of the great unwashed...I don't have the ear that many "real" musicians have, either literally (out of tune instruments don't bother me because I just don't hear that they are out of tune) and subtleties in expression and execution in performances escape me (because I also am not wired to make those discernments). Put me in a garden, OTOH, and I can spot and identify all kinds of plants by their branches/leaves/etc. A lot of people think they all look the same and can't tell them apart.
Another example...wine drinkers. There are those that can appreciate all kinds of nuances in various wines. I can't, or more accurately, never could (I don't drink alcohol anymore). People would wax rhapsodic about various flavors and aromas, and I would stare blankly. I either liked it, or I didn't. Before you say it....I know, I know, I'm a philistine....
Anyway, I wonder if people who are immersed in music and who devote a lot of time and energy to it see this as the equivalent of cheap wine in the world of piano lessons. For some people, cheap wine is totally OK and even enjoyable!
Just a thought.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login