Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Allahu Akbarriers

Allahu Akbarriers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
38 Posts 8 Posters 99 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    J
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
    #29

    Bernard, remember who you’re speaking to. I have a pretty solid track record criticizing Christianity and Judaism. I can’t really be whattabouted in this.

    But the numbers are what they are. If we had to protect public spaces from mostly Christian fundamentalists instead of Muslim jihaddists I would be straightforwardly and openly critical about it.

    And I suspect I’d find more people here in agreement with me as I did.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    • J jon-nyc

      Bernard, remember who you’re speaking to. I have a pretty solid track record criticizing Christianity and Judaism. I can’t really be whattabouted in this.

      But the numbers are what they are. If we had to protect public spaces from mostly Christian fundamentalists instead of Muslim jihaddists I would be straightforwardly and openly critical about it.

      And I suspect I’d find more people here in agreement with me as I did.

      B
      B
      Bernard
      wrote last edited by
      #30

      @jon-nyc OK. So you finally wrote, "Mulsim jihaddists". That's a whole tone different than your OP where you took swipe at all Muslims.

      The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J
        J
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #31

        I said Muslim (adjective) jihadists (noun). The latter being a descriptive term for the subset of Muslims who carry these beliefs. And yes I know that some people define ‘jihhad’ differently. But I assume in context you knew I wasn’t describing people who are merely dealing with an internal struggle with their faith. That group won’t be indiscriminately killing civilians while in religious ecstasy.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        • J jon-nyc

          I said Muslim (adjective) jihadists (noun). The latter being a descriptive term for the subset of Muslims who carry these beliefs. And yes I know that some people define ‘jihhad’ differently. But I assume in context you knew I wasn’t describing people who are merely dealing with an internal struggle with their faith. That group won’t be indiscriminately killing civilians while in religious ecstasy.

          B
          B
          Bernard
          wrote last edited by Bernard
          #32

          @jon-nyc I totally understood that, jon. And I'm saying that that conveys a very different tone (as in better) than your OP, where you wrote, "keep the Christmas market safe from the Religion of Peace™".

          The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J
            J
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #33

            Fair enough

            1 Reply Last reply
            • J jon-nyc

              Thanks. I continue to believe the forum is a better place with you here.

              ShiroKuroS
              ShiroKuroS
              ShiroKuro
              wrote last edited by ShiroKuro
              #34

              @jon-nyc said:

              I continue to believe the forum is a better place with you here.

              Agreed.

              And this forum is a better place with all of us here.

              ♥

              1 Reply Last reply
              • wtgW wtg

                Are they just for a Christmas market? I thought they just closed Oxford street to vehicle traffic ("pedestrianisation") and those barriers are to keep any traffic out.

                https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/oct/22/everyone-hates-oxford-street-will-pedestrianisation-save-it

                I was going to post the Guardian article and see if @andyd had any opinions on the closure...

                AndyDA
                AndyDA
                AndyD
                wrote last edited by
                #35

                I was going to post the Guardian article and see if @andyd had any opinions on the closure...

                We were on Oxford Street two days after this started (Thursday 29th).
                We were outside New Bond Street tube, as I wanted some joya shoes, then we headed south to Picadilly.

                We laughed because the small barriers looked half-cocked to us; but they were for pedestrians and no doubt the street will eventually be levelled with the pavement, and filled with seats, shrubs & trees.

                It badly needed doing, the footpaths by themselves are wholly inadequate for the flood of pedestrians you have to 'swim' through.
                You used to feel the nearness of large busses and speedy taxis.
                Immediately safer and less chance for pickpockets.

                Even the initial blocking of traffic lengthways works wonders.
                Traffic still crosses over Oxford Street in 6 places.
                But a definite 👍

                Ventosa viri restabit

                wtgW 1 Reply Last reply
                • AndyDA AndyD

                  I was going to post the Guardian article and see if @andyd had any opinions on the closure...

                  We were on Oxford Street two days after this started (Thursday 29th).
                  We were outside New Bond Street tube, as I wanted some joya shoes, then we headed south to Picadilly.

                  We laughed because the small barriers looked half-cocked to us; but they were for pedestrians and no doubt the street will eventually be levelled with the pavement, and filled with seats, shrubs & trees.

                  It badly needed doing, the footpaths by themselves are wholly inadequate for the flood of pedestrians you have to 'swim' through.
                  You used to feel the nearness of large busses and speedy taxis.
                  Immediately safer and less chance for pickpockets.

                  Even the initial blocking of traffic lengthways works wonders.
                  Traffic still crosses over Oxford Street in 6 places.
                  But a definite 👍

                  wtgW
                  wtgW
                  wtg
                  wrote last edited by wtg
                  #36

                  @AndyD said:

                  no doubt the street will eventually be levelled with the pavement, and filled with seats, shrubs & trees.

                  That's what they did in the town where @kluurs lives; I grew up in a nearby town. Of course that happened back in the Stone Age when I was but a teenager. They closed off the street and re-landscaped to include trees, benches, etc., in an effort to make it welcoming. And to create barriers so people who had been accustomed to turning onto Lake Street from Harlem Avenue (super busy intersection) didn't do that once vehicle traffic was prohibited.

                  Some years later, they took it all out and opened it back up to traffic.

                  https://www.chicagotribune.com/1988/11/20/oak-park-ends-mall-days/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • M
                    M
                    Mark
                    wrote last edited by
                    #37

                    Gods, religion and mysticism need to leave our collective consciousness.

                    It can't happen soon enough.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    👍
                    • wtgW
                      wtgW
                      wtg
                      wrote last edited by wtg
                      #38

                      It will be interesting to see how the Oxford Street initiative works out. Any number of cities, including Chicago, have tried various flavors of shutting down a major thoroughfare to vehicle traffic. They've met with varying degrees of success.

                      https://chi.streetsblog.org/2013/03/11/why-was-the-state-street-pedestrian-mall-a-failure

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups