Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Goodbye, Landlines

Goodbye, Landlines

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
6 Posts 3 Posters 48 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D
    D
    Daniel
    wrote last edited by Daniel
    #1

    Verizon seeks FCC approval to phase out copper landlines

    https://share.google/WdvMbDOhFwdXWG72i

    My late sister predicted this would happen.

    I was looking forward to adding a house phone for the quality reception.

    I bet every company will do the same.

    I guess I might do it. Maybe not.

    It would be nice to talk on a telephone at home without the risk of hanging up on a caller by doing something stupid like accidentally tapping your cellphone against your head, accidentally touching the screen, etc.

    Having a cheap plastic phone instead of a Bell telephone is a given but being connected to the same cell tower system you use anyway?

    Another great 100+ year old invention gone.

    IDK

    'But as they said in one of the later Rocky movies, "Time...it's undefeated.".-- Mik

    1 Reply Last reply
    • D
      D
      Daniel
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I went around my house and looked at the c. 1972 AT&T phone outlets. It still has them.

      In the kitchen, the living room, the bedroom..

      I can imagine people living here back then.

      I wonder if they still work.

      'But as they said in one of the later Rocky movies, "Time...it's undefeated.".-- Mik

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J
        J
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        It must be really expensive to maintain for so few users.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • D
          D
          Daniel
          wrote last edited by Daniel
          #4

          Utilities were built on the principle of providing as nearly universal service as possible to people. T-Mobile's profits are based on a century of groundwork by others. Many people, the usual suspects, people who live in rural or remote locations, please who have poor or unreliable signal strength because they live in mountainous areas, the poor, the elderly, and people who aren't in the coverage areas in the first place, are the ones who will pay a material price.

          You and I had a similar discussion about USPS a few years ago.

          'But as they said in one of the later Rocky movies, "Time...it's undefeated.".-- Mik

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J
            J
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #5

            USPS seems to be kept alive by delivering junk mail and Amazon packages.

            I’m not sure how they’ll support a national network of copper lines when 90% of people stop paying for it. (It seems to be down to 24% of households now, from a high of 95% 25 years ago. But it is still shedding 1-2% per year. Older people keep them, young folks never get one)

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            • J jon-nyc

              USPS seems to be kept alive by delivering junk mail and Amazon packages.

              I’m not sure how they’ll support a national network of copper lines when 90% of people stop paying for it. (It seems to be down to 24% of households now, from a high of 95% 25 years ago. But it is still shedding 1-2% per year. Older people keep them, young folks never get one)

              B
              B
              Bernard
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              It's probably time to revisit the '70s USPS reorganization. USPS was federally funded up until then. It seems to me that getting it at least partially federally funded would be a good idea. A lot has happened with technology since then.

              The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

              1 Reply Last reply

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups