Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. One reason they were holding up the release

One reason they were holding up the release

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
11 Posts 5 Posters 73 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve Miller
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    I need a shower after reading that. 😳

    1 Reply Last reply
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Steve Miller
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      I just read on Reddit that someone has figured out how to recreate the redacted parts. Items redacted by previous administrations cannot be recreated, but more recent redactions can be reversed.

      It’s Reddit, so not necessarily reliable info, but if it’s true things could get real interesting.

      Piano*DadP 1 Reply Last reply
      • wtgW wtg

        Written by Epstein to Larry Nassar (remember him?) just before Epstein committed suicide.

        alt text

        ShiroKuroS Offline
        ShiroKuroS Offline
        ShiroKuro
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @wtg disgusting

        1 Reply Last reply
        • wtgW Offline
          wtgW Offline
          wtg
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          Here's how the DOJ releases the Epstein files and how others are making them easier to read

          https://www.axios.com/2025/12/23/epstien-files-read-search-doj-library-apps

          When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie AumĂ´nier

          1 Reply Last reply
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            CHAS
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            The horror

            "The man that hath no music in himself, nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds, is fit for treasons, stratagems and spoils;” - Shakespeare

            1 Reply Last reply
            • wtgW Offline
              wtgW Offline
              wtg
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              The DOJ says the FBI says the letter is a fake.

              There was a request from the FBI in 2020 to have a handwriting expert look at the letter to see if it was really Epstein's writing. The result of that 2020 analysis is MIA so far. But the 2025 FBI knows it's a fake.

              When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie AumĂ´nier

              1 Reply Last reply
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Steve Miller
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                Of course they do.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • S Steve Miller

                  I just read on Reddit that someone has figured out how to recreate the redacted parts. Items redacted by previous administrations cannot be recreated, but more recent redactions can be reversed.

                  It’s Reddit, so not necessarily reliable info, but if it’s true things could get real interesting.

                  Piano*DadP Offline
                  Piano*DadP Offline
                  Piano*Dad
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @Steve-Miller said in One reason they were holding up the release:

                  I just read on Reddit that someone has figured out how to recreate the redacted parts. Items redacted by previous administrations cannot be recreated, but more recent redactions can be reversed.

                  It’s Reddit, so not necessarily reliable info, but if it’s true things could get real interesting.

                  One wonders if whoever did the redacting knew full well that a simple command or two could reveal the covered, but not missing, text. It's not rocket science to do redaction. Just putting black over the text with a few keystrokes doesn't do the job.

                  Alternatively, they're just truly incompetent.

                  Crazy economist who likes to write about higher education.

                  wtgW 1 Reply Last reply
                  • wtgW Offline
                    wtgW Offline
                    wtg
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    Looking for volunteers.

                    https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/23/politics/justice-department-redactions-review-epstein-files

                    When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie AumĂ´nier

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Piano*DadP Piano*Dad

                      @Steve-Miller said in One reason they were holding up the release:

                      I just read on Reddit that someone has figured out how to recreate the redacted parts. Items redacted by previous administrations cannot be recreated, but more recent redactions can be reversed.

                      It’s Reddit, so not necessarily reliable info, but if it’s true things could get real interesting.

                      One wonders if whoever did the redacting knew full well that a simple command or two could reveal the covered, but not missing, text. It's not rocket science to do redaction. Just putting black over the text with a few keystrokes doesn't do the job.

                      Alternatively, they're just truly incompetent.

                      wtgW Offline
                      wtgW Offline
                      wtg
                      wrote last edited by wtg
                      #11

                      @Piano-Dad said in One reason they were holding up the release:

                      Alternatively, they're just truly incompetent.

                      I cast my vote for that option.

                      Details on the "how to":

                      Epstein Files Hacked And Posted To X

                      “Trump’s DOJ is so incompetent that they don’t even know how to properly redact PDFs,” Brian Krassenstein, political commentator and journalist, tweeted the day the agency released the files. You might be inclined to write this off immediately, given that Krassenstein is known for his anti-Trump stance. In this case, however, that would be a mistake. As well as providing the evidence in a series of tweets that showed the highly redacted documents as well as the unredacted versions, Krassenstein went on to explain precisely how the Epstein files could be hacked.

                      While it is common to read about hackers using PDFs in attacks, the portable document format is susceptible to attack itself. The shocking truth is that it was ridiculously easy, employing straightforward methods that have been known for years. That the DOJ was seemingly unaware of the PDF bugs that have been exploited to do this is concerning from a national security viewpoint at the very least. I am surprised, given that the DOJ has shown technical competence in operations with the FBI in the past, such as remotely deleting files from thousands of U.S.-based computers.

                      I have reached out to the DOJ for a statement, but in the meantime, here’s how the hack went down.

                      https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2025/12/24/epstein-files-hacked---all-you-need-to-know/

                      When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie AumĂ´nier

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups