Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Calibri v. Times New Roman

Calibri v. Times New Roman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
4 Posts 4 Posters 32 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote last edited by Axtremus
    #1

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/10/politics/rubio-typeface-changes

    During the Biden administration the State Department changed its preferred font from Times New Roman to Calibri, citing studies that show that the latter is more accessible to people with certain visual impairments. Sec. State Rubio just announced the reversal and have the State Department back to using Times New Roman, saying the previous change to Calibri was a wasteful sop to DEI wokeness.

    I used to prefer Times New Roman, but that was before the iPhone. As more and more of my reading is done on a phone/tablet/computer screen rather than on printer papers, I changed to prefer sans-serif.

    I still like certain serif fonts (e.g., Cambria) when the fonts are big, but for most day-to-day reading, I think sans-serif is easier for me. 🤷

    ShiroKuroS 1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Axtremus

      https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/10/politics/rubio-typeface-changes

      During the Biden administration the State Department changed its preferred font from Times New Roman to Calibri, citing studies that show that the latter is more accessible to people with certain visual impairments. Sec. State Rubio just announced the reversal and have the State Department back to using Times New Roman, saying the previous change to Calibri was a wasteful sop to DEI wokeness.

      I used to prefer Times New Roman, but that was before the iPhone. As more and more of my reading is done on a phone/tablet/computer screen rather than on printer papers, I changed to prefer sans-serif.

      I still like certain serif fonts (e.g., Cambria) when the fonts are big, but for most day-to-day reading, I think sans-serif is easier for me. 🤷

      ShiroKuroS Online
      ShiroKuroS Online
      ShiroKuro
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @Axtremus said in Calibri v. Times New Roman:

      the previous change to Calibri was a wasteful sop to DEI wokeness.

      And changing back won't be wasteful? The cognitive dissonance continues....

      Also the cruelty.

      On a separate note, I hate Microsoft's new default font, Aptos. Hate hate hate it! And now, the default font for Japanese also looks horrible, and for many characters, doesn't actually look like Japanese but looks more like Chinese. Which is fine if you're typing in Chinese, but not good for Japanese, and I worry about the impact on my students' writing as well.

      It's not super hard to change the default settings in desktop applications, but in browser versions, I can't get it to set my desired font for Japanese, so I have to go in and change it manually every time. 😠

      1 Reply Last reply
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        AndyD
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Arial is what we changed to (from TNR) and used from about 1990, for its clarity, and it also saved printer ink.

        Ventosa viri restabit

        1 Reply Last reply
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          Bernard
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          I am not a fan of sans serif fonts except for display purposes. When I was a typesetter in the '80s, it was generally accepted that sans serif were easier to read in printed material. Then computer screens became ubiquitous. For screen reading, sans serif became more popular because the screen resolutions were not up to providing clear serif rendering.

          The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups