Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Pete’s take

Pete’s take

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
4 Posts 3 Posters 28 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wtgW Offline
    wtgW Offline
    wtg
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Democrats “defined everything by identity,” Pete Buttigieg says in critique of his party
    The former U.S. transportation secretary said the Democratic Party should focus more on issues gripping the country, such as health care and housing affordability.

    https://www.texastribune.org/2025/11/14/texas-tribune-festival-pete-buttigieg-2/

    When the world wearies and society ceases to satisfy, there is always the garden - Minnie Aumônier

    1 Reply Last reply
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      Bernard
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      "Affordability." Period. It worked in the election a few weeks ago in 3 disparate locations.

      The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        Daniel
        wrote last edited by Daniel
        #3

        The cost of living crisis under the Biden administration continues unabated under the Trump administration.

        Old school leftists who identified by many names starting in the late 19th century understood the central importance of the structure and functioning of economic systems to the working class.

        My cursory study of the middle class as it existed starting in the 18th century has led me to believe the middle class including those families who have achieved wealth and social status have had an unfortunate tendency to kick down
        those on the latter who lack their fortunate circumstances.

        I think this is self-defeating but haven't found a way to articulate this argument in a practical way.

        I keep beating this drum but I think there's a tremendous differentiation today in the US between the approximately 770,000 people who are homeless and everyone else.

        It's profoundly unjust, imo, for the government to take the position that the homeless are nothing but an unsightly nusuidance comprised of mentally ill drug addicts.

        It's very clear that people of all ages and backgrounds in every state are becoming homeless because of the cost of living crisis.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • B Bernard

          "Affordability." Period. It worked in the election a few weeks ago in 3 disparate locations.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Bernard said in Pete’s take:

          "Affordability." Period. It worked in the election a few weeks ago in 3 disparate locations.

          +1

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups