About that White House ballroom and the East Wing
-
"Dictator Chic".
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/trump-style-dictator-autocrats-design-214877/
The article is from 2017.
-
I think Andrew has already refused to be interviewed by the FBI but don't remember the details.
Fergie's "title" is a courtesy title in the style of a divorced peeress. Diana's title after the divorce was too.
Both outcomes were a result of a Letters Patent signed by the Queen.
It's not a royal title. I don't know how a courtesy title would be stripped.
It's just my opinion but I think Parliament should definitely strip the royal titles from Andrew, Harry and Markle.
Or more precisely I think Parliament should strip the royal titles from Harry, and especially from Andrew, and from Markle.
I haven't been a Markle fan for a long time but her fake tear (and I can prove it) at the Queen's funeral is was when I got off the train.
Andrew should be in prison for the rest of his life.
-
Latest I saw was that the wing was first put up to hide the bunker below and that the reason plans won't be seen by regular channels is that a bigger royal bunker is the real reason for the ballroom...
@Rontuner said in About that White House ballroom and the East Wing:
Latest I saw was that the wing was first put up to hide the bunker below and that the reason plans won't be seen by regular channels is that a bigger royal bunker is the real reason for the ballroom...
Melania must be worried they'll find her escape tunnel
-
President Donald Trump will likely name his new $300 million White House ballroom after himself, according to senior administration officials.
Already, officials are referring to it as "The President Donald J. Trump Ballroom." That name will likely stick, ABC News was told.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-white-house-ballroom-after-officials/story?id=126843455
And they took down a couple of very old magnolia trees...
-
Price going up; inflation running rampant.
On Wednesday, Trump discussed his plans for the ballroom, saying it will cost “about $300 million.” The administration previously put the cost of the ballroom project at $200 million.
Who is supposedly on the list of people funding the project. The amount donated is conspicuously absent.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/23/politics/ballroom-donors-white-house-trump
said in About that White House ballroom and the East Wing:
Price going up; inflation running rampant.
On Wednesday, Trump discussed his plans for the ballroom, saying it will cost “about $300 million.” The administration previously put the cost of the ballroom project at $200 million.
Who is supposedly on the list of people funding the project. The amount donated is conspicuously absent.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/23/politics/ballroom-donors-white-house-trump
The donors and what they stand to gain.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-ballroom-donors-white-house-stand-to-gain/
-
Thomas Jefferson originally built what has been demolished. This is an egregious demolition resulting in incalculable historical and cultural loss. I thought the ballroom was going to be attached to the White House. I was wrong.
Link to video -
Link to video
Completely ruined, gone.
-
I'm thinking some smart Democrats are going to promise to demolish the structure in 2029, and they won't bother asking any commission for permission.
In fact, a smart play is to tell the corporations that have funded this demolition of the East Wing and its replacement with this monstrosity that they will be expected to open their wallets again to fund the historical renovation of what was there. They will be told that the East Wing will be rebuilt and the grounds fully repaired. I suspect a complete and accurate replication of the East Wing will cost many times what the bombastic (but surely cheaply done) ballroom will cost. And those firms and individuals will likely agree to fully fund it, knowing that a refusal will have significant negative consequences for them. No one will need to spell out those consequences in plain language.
-
I'm thinking some smart Democrats are going to promise to demolish the structure in 2029, and they won't bother asking any commission for permission.
In fact, a smart play is to tell the corporations that have funded this demolition of the East Wing and its replacement with this monstrosity that they will be expected to open their wallets again to fund the historical renovation of what was there. They will be told that the East Wing will be rebuilt and the grounds fully repaired. I suspect a complete and accurate replication of the East Wing will cost many times what the bombastic (but surely cheaply done) ballroom will cost. And those firms and individuals will likely agree to fully fund it, knowing that a refusal will have significant negative consequences for them. No one will need to spell out those consequences in plain language.
