Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Suspend habeas corpus?

Suspend habeas corpus?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
3 Posts 3 Posters 104 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wtgW Offline
    wtgW Offline
    wtg
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said Friday that the Trump administration is "actively looking at" suspending habeas corpus, the right of a person to challenge their detention in court.

    If carried out by President Donald Trump, the suspension of habeas corpus would be a dramatic escalation of his administration's immigration policy by significantly curtailing a right enshrined in the Constitution.

    "First, you know, President Trump has talked about potentially suspending habeas corpus to take care of the illegal immigration problem. When could we see that happen in the future?" a reporter asked Miller as he spoke outside the White House.

    "The Constitution is clear, and that, of course, is the supreme law of the land, that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in time of invasion," Miller answered.

    "So, it's an option we're actively looking at," he continued.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wh-trump-suspending-habeas-corpus/story?id=121653587

    1 Reply Last reply
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      Bernard
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I can't see the supremes going along with this. Habeas Corpus is one of those rights, so fundamental, that it appears in the text of the Constitution, not as one of the 10 "Bill of Rights" Amendments. It has been upheld even in wartime (1944) when a Japanese citizen sued for Habeas Corpus after having been relocated to an internment camp.

      The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
        #3

        The court isn't going to buy the whole invasion/AEA thing, period. Anywhere from 7-2 to 9-0.

        1 Reply Last reply

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups