Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. You Don't Own "Your" X/Twitter Account

You Don't Own "Your" X/Twitter Account

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
6 Posts 4 Posters 90 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    This came out of the story where the Onion buys InfoWar.

    https://www.axios.com/2024/11/26/musk-x-infowars-onion-social-media

    X Corp. claims ownership of InfoWar's X/Twitter account. While X/Twitter acknowledges that the users generally own the content posted by the users, X/Twitter claims it owns the X/Twitter accounts themselves.

    "X Corp.'s [terms of service] make clear that it owns the X Accounts, as the TOS is explicit that X Corp. merely grants its users a non-exclusive license to use their accounts," the company told a federal judge in Texas.

    There's the term "non-exclusive" in there ... probably means anyone can be allowed to use "your" X/Twitter account if X/Twitter allows it. :man-shrugging:

    1 Reply Last reply
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      He's got a big ego considering he's one among billions of people on this planet.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • Q Offline
        Q Offline
        Quirt Evans
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I do not have a problem with him reclaiming names of accounts. It’s a free service, and Twitter is not the government. You get what you pay for.

        I would have a major problem, though, if he decided to commit fraud and pretend that the account was still owned by the original owner and posted under it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel
          wrote on last edited by Daniel
          #4

          I have a problem with the government mandating rules about what can be posted forming the content of technology corporations' platforms. I think the Democrats in particular want to mandate the content they permit. I think the government and these corporations are already working together to an extent. This phenomenon has reached the point in the UK that people are being arrested for posting content the government considers off limits. To be clear, I am not talking about people posting threats or anything similar.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          • D Daniel

            I have a problem with the government mandating rules about what can be posted forming the content of technology corporations' platforms. I think the Democrats in particular want to mandate the content they permit. I think the government and these corporations are already working together to an extent. This phenomenon has reached the point in the UK that people are being arrested for posting content the government considers off limits. To be clear, I am not talking about people posting threats or anything similar.

            S Online
            S Online
            Steve Miller
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Daniel

            “I think the Democrats in particular want to mandate the content they permit. “

            It’s all fun and games until people start posting kiddie porn.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel
              wrote on last edited by Daniel
              #6

              @Steve-Miller

              There are state and federal laws about child pornography. It is a crime to possess it. So it seems it would be a crime to post it.

              I'm talking about censorship by way of labeling legitimate opinions on any topic as-- "misinformation" and censoring political speech, for example-- not allowing criticism of the state of Israel under the guise of falsely labeling it as-- "antisemitism."

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups