Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Regulating the Influencers

Regulating the Influencers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
13 Posts 8 Posters 78 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Online
    J Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    Christopher Hitchens used to say “to whom would you give the power to decide what you’re not allowed to read?”

    As 89 said next door, I prefer upvote/downvote, community notes, or some way to crowd-source commentary rather than outright censorship.

    RontunerR 1 Reply Last reply
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Steve Miller
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      I would too, although the popularity of internet celebs like Rogan makes me doubt the effectiveness of letting the people decide.

      It’s the Wild West out there!

      wtgW 1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      • S Steve Miller

        I would too, although the popularity of internet celebs like Rogan makes me doubt the effectiveness of letting the people decide.

        It’s the Wild West out there!

        wtgW Offline
        wtgW Offline
        wtg
        wrote last edited by wtg
        #6

        @Steve-Miller said:

        the popularity of internet celebs like Rogan
        It’s the Wild West out there!

        It's getting impossible to know whom to trust.

        Regarding Trump assassination attempts, specifically the WH Correspondents dinner incident. The last bit about trusting unverified information is most disturbing.

        The NewsGuard survey found that 24 percent of U.S. adults believe the incident at the Washington Hilton was fake, compared with 45 percent who believed it was legitimate. An additional 32 percent said they were unsure. The survey of 1,000 American adults was conducted by YouGov from April 28 to May 4.

        “It’s very striking,” said Sofia Rubinson, an editor at NewsGuard. The results underscore broader skepticism that Americans feel toward the government and the press, she said. “Increasingly, people on all sides of the political spectrum are distrustful of both this administration and also the media,” she said, but willing to trust unverified information they see online.

        https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2026/05/11/many-americans-think-trump-assassination-attempts-were-fake-survey-finds/90026617007/

        1 Reply Last reply
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          Bernard
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          Another angle: Credentials can be over rated. The list of experts who are nothing short of whacko is extensive.

          The industrial revolution cheapened everything.

          wtgW 1 Reply Last reply
          👍
          • B Bernard

            Another angle: Credentials can be over rated. The list of experts who are nothing short of whacko is extensive.

            wtgW Offline
            wtgW Offline
            wtg
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @Bernard Definitely. Just look at some of the people in the current administration....

            1 Reply Last reply
            • J jon-nyc

              Christopher Hitchens used to say “to whom would you give the power to decide what you’re not allowed to read?”

              As 89 said next door, I prefer upvote/downvote, community notes, or some way to crowd-source commentary rather than outright censorship.

              RontunerR Offline
              RontunerR Offline
              Rontuner
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @jon-nyc said:

              Christopher Hitchens used to say “to whom would you give the power to decide what you’re not allowed to read?”

              As 89 said next door, I prefer upvote/downvote, community notes, or some way to crowd-source commentary rather than outright censorship.

              Intead of "censorship", call it consequences. Takes on a whole 'nuther source of responsibility...

              1 Reply Last reply
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                Daniel
                wrote last edited by Daniel
                #10

                A person can hold a credential and still be incompetent and/or corrupt.

                Also, people with credential x can and do disagree with each other.

                I'm not seeing any practical point.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Daniel
                  wrote last edited by Daniel
                  #11
                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Daniel
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12
                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • dolmansaxlilD Online
                      dolmansaxlilD Online
                      dolmansaxlil
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      I know someone who has become an influencer in the financial sector. Neither he nor his partner have zero credentials. The recommendations they make are legal, but very risky. I don’t really understand all the ins and outs but it amounts to leveraging everything you have to take loans and then investing that money. There is a name for it that I have forgotten. Again all legal. But their audience is folks like me - teachers and other middle class professionals who are doing fine but definitely are not wealthy. They charge people for their “course” and consultation fees. They are in the camp of “don’t let those financial advisors take your hard earned money - we can teach you how to do it yourselves”. I don’t know what that looks like if people start defaulting on those loans.

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups