Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

WTF-Beta

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Off Key - General Discussion
  4. Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Key - General Discussion
4 Posts 1 Posters 51 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Daniel
    wrote last edited by Daniel
    #1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

    Apparently, the SCOTUS stuck down what Trump was doing and how he was doing it and Trump has been refusing to obey the Court for three days.

    Whoa.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/marbury-v-madison

      1 Reply Last reply
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        Daniel
        wrote last edited by Daniel
        #3

        This is old news. I don't pay attention to news for three days and this is the reward.

        I in no way mean this as a monologue.

        I'm very interested to hear others' opinions.

        The sound of "I told you so" is ringing in my ears.

        I thought the Democratic ticket was all kinds of problematic. I still think so.

        I'll give them the grace of not thinking they took a fall.

        But they ran a campaign on saving democracy by putting a person up who literally got not one democratic vote against any opponent to "win" even one delegate.

        Then the Democrats said endorse this person or...

        Kudos to the many of you whose opinions turned out to be on the money.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel
          wrote last edited by Daniel
          #4

          Edit- I fell for the "altered or synthetic content" click bait disclaimer by not seeing it.

          I think he's violating much of the Constitution, it also seems clear the SCOTUS is useless.

          My error.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          Powered by NodeBB | Contributors
          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups