I decided to dig deeper into this issue of gender affirming care in prisons and detention centers. When Trump said this in the debate, I figured he was lying. He wasn’t.

When Harris ran her doomed 2019 campaign, her campaign filled out policy questionnaires from various groups. One question asked about support for trans care, and the response was that she supported it for prisoners and detainees, including undocumented people. She also said she was proud to have worked for these measures (paraphrasing). Apparently, at least two prisoners got surgery, but no one knows if any undocumented people did.

How can this be? Well, the law is well established that the state must provide medical care for prisoners and detainees. If the state imprisons a person who is on blood pressure meds, the state is keeping them from getting the meds on the outside, so the state has to provide them. Makes sense. It seems that a couple of judges used that reasoning for trans care, so Harris figured she would support it as required by law. But . . . Just because something is the law in the eyes of some judges does not mean a candidate cannot disagree.

Anyway, we need to figure out a way for candidates to be able to win primaries without adopting ridiculous positions. In my state, only party members can vote in the primary. That means independents (including moderate former Dems) can’t weigh in in favor of moderate candidates, so the fringe has more power than it should. Maybe the primary should be open to Dems and independents?

@pique Understood. My undergrad degree was in finance, so used to know how to evaluate stocks. I'm a little rusty, but I don't mind it. When we have some money, I think about what companies have a good product or service. I check a few basic pieces of data, like price earnings, and I check various analysts outlooks and news reports, looking for trouble.

I don't buy anything I don't understand, so no crypto or gold bars. I stay away from anything trendy because trends come and go. Buy and hold strategy doesnt mix well with the latest flash in the pan. In a way, buying a few of your own stocks is kind of fun, kind of like going to Vegas, except you usually make money over time.

Some of my.picks have done super well, and others have cratered. But . . . No taxes and no fees.

Someday I will compare my picks with my retirement mutual funds. For now, I don't want to know.

Planning to get it. Done with Twitter.

@pique There are many kinds of mutual funds. Stocks are one kind.

I try to avoid mutual funds. If I buy and hold an individual stock and its value increases over ten years, I will owe capital gains tax when I sell. No other taxes or admin costs.

Say I buy a successful mutual fund and hold for ten years. Each year, the manager buys and sells stocks within the portfolio. I owe taxes on my piece of the action each year, not just at the end. I think I also owe tax when I sell at the end. And there are administrative costs too.

That seemed to be the situation when I stopped buying mutual funds. There was one year in the 90s when our mutual funds threw off all of this taxable income. I was so annoyed that I now buy and hold individual stocks.

I still use mutual funds for retirement accounts because those don't have immediate tax consequences.

Everyone, please correct me if I'm wrong. I might be.

I use it constantly. It matches my level of cooking ambition. If I'm going to cook, I want whatever it is to get as close to restaurant level as I can get it, but without a lot of fussy or expensive ingredients.

Cindy -- who hardly ever uses any ingredient listed as "optional "

@wtg I'm not sure he's can stop local schools from mandating vaccines.

He can withdraw approvals, like abortion drugs and birth control. Where does he stand on that?

No, Dems haven't made it a campaign issue. Republicans have, by exploiting the fact that these are things Progressives champion. The Trans issues are one example of this. Dems love to get outraged about benign policies or actions that happen to disadvantage a group viewed as downtrodden.

I think we should champion the downtrodden. The downtrodden is everyone who has to sign away their right to sue a corporation that harmed them because they signed terms and conditions on a web site.

Allow me to share an experience that illustrates why Dems are losing.

I have a colleague, someone I supervise. This person uses a female name; has a short but feminine haircut; has feminine features; dresses in an ordinary way (meaning no dresses, wears pants and shorts and shoes that many women would wear but not many men ).

This person uses they/them pronouns. When I inevitably refer to this person as she or her, I get an immediate public correction, after which i mumble "them, sorry." So it is my responsibility to check my read of this person's clear gender expression AND ignore my lifetime of the importance of subject/verb agreement. All so this person doesn't have to hear she or her.

I fully understand the thinking that got us here. We want to be inclusive, got it. But this is very different from the civil rights struggle. Sure, the preferred name for black people morphed every few years. But no one had to grapple with it every day, and it didn't violate the rules of grammar.

Bottom line: Our inclusivity is killing us. It has us insisting that people get pregnant, not women. That Trans girls should compete with his girls. That Spanish would be better with out gender. It is signaling to the whole country that we care only about being the language police than in the real problems facing us all individually and collectively.

I think there is room for the Dems to become the party that protects the little guy. Regular people get mistreated all the time, on matters big and small. Let's fix that.

I'm in a deep blue state. People here are shell shocked. I doubt people are worried because of that privilege and other privileges.

My most direct concern is that one of my daughters might need an abortion. If medication abortion becomes illegal or there is a 15 week ban, I'd have to fly them to Europe for care, assuming that is not also illegal.

Regarding work, well . . . Use your imagination. I am afraid to say anything publicly. I do plan to stay, but I can imagine scenarios where I would have to quit. These scenarios are not outlandish.

I am not worried that federal workers will be fired en mass. You would just need one favorable ruling from one federal judge to get a nationwide injunction. And I think the biggest targets would be Education and EPA.

@Steve-Miller take Black people. As someone born in 1961, I cannot imagine civil rights and discrimination being much lower than No. 1 on a black person's list of concerns. And to vote republican made you a pariah.

Trump won a bigger share of the Black vote each time her ran.

I think a lot of black people see racism as less of a motivator than before.

More generally, I think Dems see giveaways as a way to win votes, but it isn't. Part of the problem is that folks just dont understand the reasons they are struggling because the reasons are complex.