So, the first time I heard it (maybe two years ago), accompanying a violin performance, I thought it sounded great. I was completely enamored of the instrument and thought “ah ha, so this is the mythical Fazioli, it’s glorious!” That was long enough ago that my memory is fuzzy though, so I couldn’t tell you what about it made me react that way.

Anyway, about a week ago, I attended a cello performance (by the person I played with over the summer!). This time, again the stringed instrument was the main event, but my first thought about the piano was that it sounded ”clinical.” Don’t ask me what that means, I have no idea! That was just the word that popped in my head to describe it. The piano wasn’t the main event, and the cello was amazing, so my attention was there for the most part, but I wasn’t impressed by the Fazioli the way I had been when I heard it accompanying the violin two years back.

Then the other day, I went to a lecture/performance by my piano teacher (which I should make a separate post about btw, it was really cool!) This time, the piano was the main event of course. So I could really hear and focus on the Fazioli. And I definitely wasn’t impressed by this piano.

First of all, I thought it sounded dry, cold, and too bright. And yes, clinical. I also thought it sounded like a very expensive Yamaha that had been poorly prepped. And no shade to Yamaha, I love Yamaha pianos and currently own a C2 that I absolutely love.

The upper registers in particular sounded too bright to me. To the point of being unpleasant and harsh.

The bass I thought was pretty good.

But really, it made me wonder who’s prepping this piano.

So, here’s where my over-imagination kicks in. About three years ago, I had my piano tuned by one of the main piano tuners at the uni. And it was terrible, I thought she did a terrible job, and I never called her back. I happen to know that she’s relatively new there, so I wondered if the results were due to her inexperience.

Since then I’ve had my piano tuned by the former (retired) head tuner at the uni, and he is absolutely amazing. I love how my piano sounds and I’m convinced that he just does the perfect tuning for this piano. He also spent pretty much his whole working career as the head tuner at my uni, where there are about 500 pianos that need caring for. Whenever he’s here, we talk about pianos and it’s clear that he just has such true mastery of the instrument and such a keen devotion to acoustics as an artistic science.

So back to the Fazioli. I couldn’t help thinking that the dry brightness in the treble could be just a maintenance/prep issue, and I would hate to think that the woman who temporarily destroyed my piano with her crappy tuning is now destroying this Fazioli with more crappy tuning.

In the other concert hall in this building, there is a 9 foot Steinway, which I’ve heard at least four times in recent concerts, most recently, by my piano teacher from last year. This Steinway sounds just glorious. Exactly what I think of when I think of the perfect concert instrument.

So, either the same person isn’t prepping these two pianos, or they only know how to prep S&S but not Faziolis…. Or the Fazioli is a terrible piano. Those are the only possible explanations.