<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[At least for now, Ford engineers still better than AI]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ford says it has hired back some human engineers after AI failed to match their skills and experience.</p>
<p dir="auto">In a bid to reap the benefits of the tech, which developers claim can cut costs and boost productivity, the US carmaker adopted it across some parts of its operations including for quality checks.</p>
<p dir="auto">But, according to Bloomberg, its executives said the firm has rehired more than 300 "veteran" quality inspectors in recent years to make up for the pitfalls of automated systems.</p>
<p dir="auto">"Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it's only as good as the information you use to train it," Charles Poon, vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, told reporters.</p>
<p dir="auto">"Over prior years, we didn't pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles," he said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrkd41n2v9o" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrkd41n2v9o</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://wtf.coffee-room.com/topic/3802/at-least-for-now-ford-engineers-still-better-than-ai</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 01:01:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://wtf.coffee-room.com/topic/3802.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 22:34:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>