<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Canadian observations]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Worthwhile Canadian Observations</p>
<p dir="auto">About a “boring” country that definitely isn’t</p>
<p dir="auto">For those puzzled by my headline: Back in 1986 The New Republic challenged its readers to come up with a headline more boring than “Worthwhile Canadian Initiative,” the title of a New York Times op-ed by Flora Lewis. They couldn’t. Canada, you see, was considered inherently boring.</p>
<p dir="auto">As I wrote a couple of months ago, economists have never considered Canada boring: It has often been a laboratory for distinctive policies. But now it’s definitely not boring: Canada, which will hold a snap election next month, seems poised to deliver a huge setback to Donald Trump’s foreign ambitions, one that may inspire much of the world — including many people in the United States — to stand up to the MAGA power grab.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/worthwhile-canadian-observations?publication_id=277517&amp;post_id=159777254&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=53zo0e&amp;triedRedirect=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/worthwhile-canadian-observations?publication_id=277517&amp;post_id=159777254&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=53zo0e&amp;triedRedirect=true</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://wtf.coffee-room.com/topic/1530/canadian-observations</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 06:36:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://wtf.coffee-room.com/topic/1530.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:54:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>